The Yale Law School Center for Global Legal Challenges is an independent Center that promotes the understanding of international law, national security law, and foreign relations law. The Center has filed two briefs as amicus curiae in support of the petitioners in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. in order to promote accurate interpretation of international law in the case at the U.S. Supreme Court. Both briefs are available on the Center’s website. The Center’s Supplemental Brief argues that extraterritorial application of the Alien Tort Statute is fully consistent with international law and makes clear that many countries have provided for both civil and criminal extraterritorial jurisdiction over violations of international law. This website was established to provide ready access to the sources cited in the Center’s Supplemental Brief, which include foreign statutes and case law from around the globe, as well as international law and domestic law and some secondary source materials.
Sources for Supplemental Brief of Yale Law School Center for Global Legal Challenges
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum
CASES
Aguinda v. Texaco, Inc., 303 F.3d 470 (2d Cir. 2002)
Al-Adsani v. United Kingdom, 34 Eur. Ct. H.R.11 (2001)
Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp., 488 U.S. 428 (1989)
Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Dem. Rep. Congo v. Belg.), 2002 I.C.J. 63 (Feb. 14) (majority opinion) (Joint Separate Opinion of Judges Higgins, Kooijmans and Buergenthal)
Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (1964)
Bouzari v. Islamic Republic of Iran, [2004] 71 O.R. 3d 675 (Can.)
Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 654 F.3d 11 (D.C. Cir. 2011)
F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A., 542 U.S. 155 (2004)
Ferrini v. Ger., Cass., 11 marcia 2004, no. 5044/4, ILDC 19 (IT 2004)
Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980)
Glen v. Club Mediterranee, 450 F.3d 1251 (11th Cir. 2006)
Jones v. Ministry of Interior of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, [2006] UKHL 26
Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Ger. v. It.), Judgment (Feb. 3, 2012)
Kadic v. Karadzic, 70 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 1995)
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 621 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 2010)
Matar v. Dichter, 563 F.3d 9 (2d Cir. 2009)
Murray v. Schooner Charming Betsy, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 64 (1804)
Prosecutor v. Furundzija, Case No. IT-95-17/1-T, Judgment (Dec. 10, 1998)
Sarei v. Rio Tinto, 671 F.3d 736 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc)
Sinochem Int’l Co. v. Malaysia Int’l Shipping Corp., 549 U.S. 422 (2007)
Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692 (2004)
S.S. “Lotus” (Fr. v. Turk.), Judgment, 1927 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 10 (Sept. 7)
Tachiona v. United States, 386 F.3d 205 (2d Cir. 2004)
Zhang v. Zemin, [2010] 243 FLR 299
STATUTES AND CONSTITUTIONS
Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350
Argentine National Code of Criminal Procedure
Argentine National Constitution(Spanish/English)
Belgian Code of Criminal Procedure
Bolivian Code of Criminal Procedure
Colombian Code of Criminal Procedure
Costa Rican Code of Criminal Procedure
Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, S.C. 2000, c. 24 (Can.)
Criminal Justice Act (1988) (U.K.)
Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China
Danish Administration of Justice Act
Dutch International Crimes Act
Finnish Criminal Procedure Act
French Code of Criminal Procedure
German Code of Crimes Against International Law
German Code of Criminal Procedure
International Criminal Court Act 2001 (U.K.)
Italian Code of Criminal Procedure
Italian Law No. 498 of 3 November 1988
Luxembourg Code of Criminal Investigation
Myanmar Code of Criminal Procedure
Panama Judicial Code of Criminal Procedure
Portuguese Criminal Code
Portuguese Criminal Procedure Code
Portuguese Law on Criminal Violations of International Humanitarian Law
Romanian Criminal Procedure Code
Senegal Code of Criminal Procedure
Spanish Code of Criminal Procedure
Spanish Judicial Power Organization Act No.6/1985
Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure
Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991, 28 U.S.C. § 1350 note
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, July 17, 1998, 2187 U.N.T.S. 90
Christopher A. Whytock, The Evolving Forum Shopping System, 96 Cornell L. Rev. 481 (2011)
Curtis A. Bradley, Universal Jurisdiction and U.S. Law, 2001 U. Chi. Legal F. 323 (2001)
Curtis A. Bradley & Mitu Gulati, Withdrawing from International Custom, 120 Yale L.J. 202 (2010)
Jack L. Goldsmith, Against Cyberanarchy, 65 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1199 (1998)
Louis Henkin, International Law: Politics, Values and Functions, 216 Recueil des Cours 9 (1989 IV)
Note from the Permanent Mission of Italy to the United Nations
Oppenheim’s International Law (9th ed. 1992)
Report of the Comm. on Foreign Relations, S. Exec. Rep. No. 101-30 (1990)
Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law of the United States (1987)